My Photo
Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Spider-Man 3

Was Ratatouille a Flop?

you have a... rat! This is a little older, but the Vulture Blog is reporting on Jim Hill's Media Blog that not only does Disney feel that Pixar's Ratatouille was a flop at the box office, but Pixar feels that Disney did a lame job of marketing the product.

To this, I have two things to say:

  • To Pixar: Shut up.  The next time you want someone to market a movie to children about a rat in a French restaurant (in a summer with Spidey, Captain Jack, Transformers, and Shrek) why don't you try it yourself?
  • To Disney: Shut up.  According to Box Office Mojo, the film has made over $413 million worldwide (with a production budget of $150 million).  May we all have flops as disastrous as this.

New Spider-Man 3 Toys - "I Forgive You"

Thanks to David Poland and YouTube, this is the most biting satire of Spider-Man 3 I've ever seen. 

"I know how to play the piano - urrggh!"

Looking Good, Feeling Good

I can't really say it better than Portfolio or Variety did, so I'll just reprint the good news from the studios.  I hope you like what's in theaters, because based on these numbers, we're about to get lots more of the same:

"Paramount recently became the fifth studio to make more than a billion dollars this year in foreign box office, joining Sony, Warner Bros., Disney and Fox in crossing that bench mark. It's the first time that five studios have hit that mark within a calendar year, Variety reports.

Warner Bros. leads the pack with about $1.2 billion as Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is due to reach the $500 million milestone this weekend. Fox follows at $1.1 billion, with The Simpsons Movie now at $109 million; Disney is at $1.02 billion, led by Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End at $644.6 million; Sony's at $1.01 billion with over half that from Spider-Man 3.

Universal is bringing up the rear with $404 million, a tally that should increase with the release of Bourne Ultimatum, and the expansion of I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry, Knocked Up, and Evan Almighty."

Looks Like I Spoke Too Soon

Howard Stringer, Sony CEO No sooner do I write about how defensive, silly, and basically juvenile Disney is regarding their "not having the biggest weekend ever" problem, but then Sony Pictures goes and does something that makes Disney look like Mother Teresa by comparison. 

Thanks to Nikki Finke at Deadline Hollywood Daily, I give you this turd on a plate:

"While Disney and the filmmakers of Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End deserve their due on a remarkable opening worldwide, there are some irregularities in their claim regarding record-setting. There are at least two territories, Italy and France, where Buena Vista International opened the film on Tuesday --  in essence adding a seventh day of  grosses into Pirates' “six day record”. While there may or may not be other territories that opened prior to Wednesday, we believe that as more and more day-and-date releases enter the marketplace, there should be a consistent standard in international box office reporting. This issue is larger than an opening week box office statistic. For the record, Spider-Man 3 grossed $418.1M in its first seven days of release worldwide with $256.7M generated from territories overseas and $161.4M accumulated in box office receipts from North America."

I'm all for equality in bookkeeping, but does it really matter if someone in Italy saw Pirates on the sixth day or the seventh?  Even the accounting department couldn't give a crap about this one...  It all hits the same country, the same film, and the same quarter and shareholders aren't missing a dime.

Let it go people.  You are arguing about records that no one cares about - not even box office freaks like me.

UPDATE: David Poland chimes in, and says it better than I ever could:

Sony is acting likely a whiny infant ("We don't like their German numbers ... wah wah!") because their ego about the biggest worldwide opening is tweaked.  There is no other excuse for the outburst, as there is not a single dime of revenue to be derived for Spidey 3 by Pirates 3's worldwide opening being diminished ... just ego. 

Spinning The Box Office Results

The fact is this.  If you compare opening weekends here in the US, Pirates of the Caribbean 3 made less money in 4 days ($142 million) than Spider-Man 3 did in 3 days ($151 million). 

depp

So, how does Disney respond to having the 5th best weekend of all time?  With class all the way...

Part 1:  We had an international strategy all along.  Who cares about domestic numbers?

Mark Zoradi, president of Walt Disney Studios marketing and distribution told the NY Times, "We had such an international cast, we had a story that wasn't landlocked to North America, so this was the absolute perfect movie to open on global basis. That was the strategy."

Part 2:  We don't care about opening weekend grosses anyway.  (Yeah, right...)

Chris LeRoy, Buena Vista's senior vice president general sales manager said, "I don't like to put too much emphasis on what the opening weekend means."

Part 3:  I mean... it was actually more important to us to break the (ever heralded) Memorial Day weekend record.

LeRoy, "What we wanted to accomplish was to break the Memorial Day weekend record and we're very pleased with that."

Part 4:  Spider-Man 3 had it easier than we did due to less competition.

LeRoy again, "Spider-Man 3 had a wide open playing field and, though the market expanded to a spectacular degree [this weekend], there was just more competition."

Part 5:  Remind everyone how big the previous film was.

And finally, from LeRoy, "I think it was hard to expect it to top No. 2 [Dead Man's Chest]. Market conditions change so much from one movie to the other."

What a steaming crock of PR hooey.  You made $156.1 million in four days (if you include the Thursday night previews).  That is an insane amount of money.  Own it.

Michael Clayton Trailer

clooney If you're already weary of the Spidey, Shrek, and Pirates 3 films, you're in luck because here comes the serious stuff.  Check out George Clooney in the trailer for Michael Clayton which looks a bit like Erin Brockovich and A Civil Action, but seems compelling nonetheless.

But... am I the only one who thought Julia Roberts and Liam Neeson were in a movie of the same name about 10 years ago?

Also, is Clooney looking more like Taylor Hicks, or am I completely losing my mind?

So That Happened...

This weekend, as Shrek 3 became the 3rd biggest opening ever, and according to Dreamworks/Paramount, the biggest animated film of all time (I'm not so sure about that - did they see the acting in Spider-Man 3?), it also became the 8th film to make over $100 million in its opening weekend.  For what it's worth, I'm sure this list will have 10 films by the end of the summer after Pirates 3 and Harry Potter 5.

Here are the current top box office openings of all time, according to Box Office Mojo:

Spider-Man 3 $151,116,516
Pirates of the Caribbean 2 $135,634,554
Shrek the Third $122,000,000
Spider-Man $114,844,116
Star Wars - Episode III $108,435,841
Shrek 2 $108,037,878
X-Men: The Last Stand $102,750,665
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire $102,685,961

Looking at these films in a vacuum makes it hard to comprehend how huge they are.  Try and remember that most films don't make this much money if you add up their entire domestic, international, DVD/Video/Cable runs.  Try to remember that Batman changed the world when it had the first ever opening of $40 million way back in 1989.  Spidey 3 made almost 4 times that amount.  Inflation and rising ticket prices do NOT make up the difference.

I can't help but feel as is this is the Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, Mark McGuire era of blockbuster movie openings, and I'm already numb to their impact.  I would love for someone with more time and smarter than I am to try and figure out who are the dealers, what is the steroid, who are the owners, and who are the players (all metaphorically, of course).  I'm ready for a Brady Anderson or Luis Gonzales to hit 50 home runs, but in the cinematic world.  Basically, when will a Rob Schneider/Andy Dick film open to $100 million?  Because at that point, I will be done at this restaurant, and I'm asking for my check.

I just have a few rhetorical questions:

  • How has it become "boring" for a film to break $100 million on its opening weekend? 
  • How in the world has it become commonplace for a film to open on over 4,000 screens? 
  • And really, how in the world did X-Men 3 only make $234 million in its entire theatrical run after making $102 million in its first 3 days?!?!?  Fox should be embarrassed.

My one real question is: how did this all come to pass?  Who did the math to figure out the secret formula that would stack the deck completely in the favor of the tentpole films?  How did the stars align so that audiences, filmmakers, theater owners, and studios all arrived on the same page?  I can't even get my kids to follow me in the mall, much less even begin to understand how to align millions of people and organizations so that those gigantic numbers end up on the chart above.

Where You'll Be Spending Your Cinematic Dollars This Summer

I thought a little calendar might come in handy as you do your weekend summer movie planning.  This is not every film being released this summer - just the big tentpoles (and a few others), because as much as you say you hate them, you know you're going to see them anyway:

May 4 - You already spent your money on Spider-Man 3.  Nice work.

May 11 - 28 Weeks Later made about $10 million last weekend and will need help if there's going to be a 28 Months Later.

May 18 - Shrek the Third.  Buzz is non-existent... even though the sequel was humongous.

May 25 - Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End.  It's the longest one yet, and even the writers don't understand what it's about.

June 1 - Knocked Up.  Can't Wait.

June 8 - Huge counter-programming weekend.  Surf's Up for the kids, Ocean's 13 for me, and Hostel II for um... them.

June 15 - Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer.  It can't be worse than the last one, can it?

June 22 - Evan Almighty: The World's Most Expensive Comedy.  I would laugh heartily if Knocked Up made more money than this, but they're aiming it at the kiddies, not rated R like the Judd Apatow film, so I'm not getting my hopes up.  Also 1408 (John Cusack in a Stephen King thriller) and Captivity (the billboards the government doesn't want you to see!)

June 27 - Live Free or Die Hard (aka Die Hard 4.0) with a non-R rating.  Can John McClane say "Yippee-ki-yay, motherfucker" in a PG-13 film?  I guess we'll find out. 

June 29 - Ratatouille from Pixar will show pundits why you don't need to pump out a sequel to make a successful film.  On another note, Michael Moore takes on the healthcare industry with Sicko.

July 4 - Transformers.  This might be where Michael Bay trounces Bruce at the box office to get his revenge for their recent spatLicense to Wed will probably only be watchable since "Jim" from The Office is starring.

July 13 - Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.  Why is no one talking about this film?  Are they too distracted by the final book coming out the week after?

July 20 - I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry and Hairspray.  I just know there's a homophobia joke in here somewhere...

July 27 - The Simpsons Movie.  What are the weekly ratings on this show these days?  Who is still watching?  Wouldn't this have made sense about 8 years ago?  Also, Lindsay Lohan's newest box office disappointment, I Know Who Killed Me.

August 3 - The Bourne Ultimatum.  Yessss....

August 10 - Rush Hour 3 - The movie that society practically demanded to see.  Stardust also appears here.

August 17 - The Invasion is the film the Wachowskis had to take over, and Superbad has Michael Cera from Arrested Development, so I'm there.

Craig's Clips of the Day

Here are some more links that I've been holding onto for a while:

Anne Thompson Is on a Roll

tobey Just over the last few weeks, the work on her blog has been excellent and especially insightful.  These are short, but they worked for me:

Falling Short of Expectations

spiderman3_blackchestposter Over at Movie Marketing, Improved, Clay talks about a piece from Variety that says (in a nutshell) that people don't feel bad about downloading content illegally, because they don't see the value in what the studios are delivering today.  Seems like a crappy rationalization to me (it's okay to steal something if the quality isn't good), but that's not really my point.

Clay uses some interesting examples of how perception or expectations often fall short of the final deliverables when it comes to entertainment, such as a CD with only one good song on it, or the movie trailer that gives away all the good jokes.  More interesting is his experience with the film The Village, which was marketed one way, but then was actually a very different film than advertised, and he describes how his experience with the film (having heard what it was actually about) was different from his friends, who had just seen the trailers.

These scenarios are fascinating to me.  It's as if the marketing executives of a studio can watch a film, understand what it's about, and then say something like, "you know... the kids like the horror porn like Hostel these days.  Do you think we can spin the trailer that way?"  How can they not expect the consumer to be disappointed?  I can think of two other instances in the last calendar year where I walked out of the theater thinking, "well, that wasn't what they told me it was going to be," and it affected how I felt about the film.  Does anyone remember how The Break Up was sold?  It was almost a Wedding Crashers sequel, or any other wacky Vince Vaughn comedy.  Did you actually see The Break Up?  Whoa... that was actually some heavy stuff, and probably the worst date movie ever.

The same thing happened to Zodiac, which was clearly sold as a serial killer thriller, when it was really much closer to All the President's Men.  Admittedly, this is a less sexy sell, but more accurate nonetheless.

Now I'm not going to cry for truth in advertising.  That's crazy talk.  And I'm not advocating for a world where there are no surprises left in the films we see (imagine seeing Psycho for the first time, but not knowing that the main star of the film, Janet Leigh, dies in the first 30 minutes.).  But when the audience is expecting a certain something based on the expectations that you set for them through your marketing activity, and then you deliver something completely different, you're just pissing them off.  It's a word-of-mouth killer, and that's going to hit films' bottom lines after opening weekend has come and gone.

As a completely naive suggestion, maybe the people that made the film (director, screenwriter, editor) should also make the trailers and ads... just a thought that I'll throw out there, knowing that it will never ever be put into practice.

On a personal note, I'll admit that after having this happen to me so many times, and being so disappointed by the potential of film after film, I'm experiencing a new sensation: the anticipation or promise of a film is now more exciting to me than actually watching it.

As an example, try this:  are you psyched for the new Spider-Man film?  You know, the one with Topher and Venom and the black Spidey suit?  Yeah?  Cool, go see it next weekend.

Then come back and tell me if the movie watching experience was better or worse than the excitement you had over the last few months thinking about what it could have been.

UPDATE: Now I really want you to do my experiment, especially since David Poland thinks that Spidey 3 just plain stinks...

The Bourne Ultimatum Trailer

This is just the summer of threes, isn't it?  Pirates 3, Shrek 3, Ocean's 13, Spider-Man 3, and now, Jason Bourne 3 is here with The Bourne Ultimatum.  Enjoy.

Final Spider-Man 3 Trailer

The final trailer for Spider-Man 3 is out, and while I've been disappointed by both Spidey movies in the past (I know... I'm in the minority, but I think Kirsten Dunst has been awful and the films were extraordinarily cheesy), I'm pumped for number 3.  There's very little Sandman in this one, but Venom makes a big showing at the end. 

[Make sure to click on the curbside labeled "See the exclusive final trailer."  For some reason, they've made it difficult to find.]

Venom - As You've Never Seen Him Before

Maybe it's just me, but the new villian in Spider-Man 3 just doesn't seem that scary:

Thanks to Burbanked for turning me onto this one!

Spiderman Poster - Venom

I'm on vacation, thus blogging is slow, but I stumbled across this new poster for Spider-Man 3, and all I can say is, "Oh.  My.  God."